The Official Blog of matt-perry.net

Entries categorized as ‘SBC’

Caught in the Act of Changing His Mind?!? *Gasp* (Mohler)

July 27, 2006 · 2 Comments

Ethics Daily is out with a story that SBC President Frank Page was once a proponent of women as pastors. The story points to Dr. Page’s 1980 doctoral dissertation written at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In that dissertation (which I have read), Dr. Page argued for the abolition of all distinctions in the role of men and women in the church. The dissertation is clear in making this argument — and it bears all the marks of a doctoral dissertation submitted on this subject back in 1980. I will explain that comment momentarily.

Now, Dr. Page affirms The Baptist Faith and Message [revised 2000] which clearly states that the office of pastor is limited to men as authorized by Scripture. He has affirmed this statement on his SBC President’s Web page [go here].

Has Dr. Page been caught in the act of changing his mind? Apparently so. For some, this fact is something of a scandal. After all, this is a significant and controversial issue — and one which was a major factor in the SBC controversy and the conservative resurgence. The fact that Dr. Page “switched sides” on this issue is enough to draw fire from any number of directions — but mostly from those who firmly support women as pastors [at least in theory]. I phrased that statement intentionally to remind all readers that the support for women as pastors, even among those who present themselves as avid proponents of women as pastors, has yet to translate into any significant number of women serving as pastors — even among those churches. Has any large and historic church identified as “moderate” in the SBC struggle called a woman as senior pastor?

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Categories: SBC

Frank Page sets up a President’s Page at SBC.net

July 7, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I hope you will notice that at the SBC.net website that our newly-elected President Frank Page has set up a page that will allow him to express his thoughts to readers in cyberspace. As a relatively unknown candidate, this will be very helpful for us as Southern Baptists to get to know the face of our SBC for the next two years.

Categories: SBC

Was the SBC Conservative Resurgence Necessary? You Bet!!

June 23, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., President of Southern Seminary, has a new blog dealing with issues pertaining to the SBC entitled Conventional Thinking.  In one entry, he gives some good reasons why the conservative resurgence in the SBC was entirely warranted and necessary.  Click here to read the entry and if you are a Southern Baptist, please bookmark this blog — it will be quite helpful in understanding all things SBC.

Categories: SBC · Theology

Congratulations to Frank Page, the new SBC President

June 14, 2006 · 2 Comments

Our family is having a wonderful time at the Southern Baptist Convention Annual Meeting here in Greensboro, NC.  It is truly a study in cooperation and parliamentary procedure — not to mention a great way to catch up on all the SBC entities.  The fellowship is nice as well.  I have had the chance to see people I haven't seen in years!  The high point in that aspect was seeing Chris Whaley and his family.  Chris serves as pastor of the First Baptist Church of Longwood, FL, and was very instrumental in me starting out in the ministry in the early 1990s.  

Special congratulations to Frank Page.  Although I voted for Jerry Sutton, it was clear that the other nominees jumped on the fact that Ronnie Floyd's church gave only 0.27% of their annual budget to the Cooperative Program.  Frank Page's church gives over 12%. 

The best and the worst lines of the convention came from Frank Page's nominator, Forrest Pollock, pastor of Bell Shoals Baptist Church in Brandon, Fla..  The best was this: "My father could not spell SBC President without the letters 'CP'." 

But he also gave the worst, as noted, "This vote is not about theology, but methodology."  Are they mutually exclusive?  To most Southern Baptists, they must be.  Theology drives everything.  If theology is not driving your methodology, I'm not interested in your methodology. 

More tomorrow (hopefully). 

Categories: Church Life · SBC

NAMB trustees to place Reccord under ‘Executive Level controls’

March 25, 2006 · 1 Comment

By Art Toalston

ALPHARETTA, Ga. (BP)–Robert E. (Bob) Reccord, president of the Southern Baptist North American Mission Board, will work under several sets of “Executive Level controls” signaled by NAMB’s trustees during a special meeting March 23.

The trustees based their deliberations on a 19-page report by a nine-member trustee task force created in response to an article in the Georgia Baptist Convention’s newsjournal, The Christian Index, which set forth a range of allegations about NAMB’s evangelism and church planting strategies; the size and makeup of its missionary force; and management issues related to Reccord.

“We want the Southern Baptist Convention to know we’ve responded to the issues [through the task force report] and because of that response we believe that you can trust what we’re doing here at NAMB,” trustee chairman Barry Holcomb said in a news conference after the meeting.

“We want Southern Baptists to know you can trust the North American Mission Board to take your Cooperative Program dollars that you generously give through the state conventions,” Holcomb said, “and you can trust us with your Annie Armstrong Easter Offering to be on mission and to do the work of God’s Kingdom.”

The task force report will be posted on www.namb.net today (NOTE:  It is now posted — click here

The 58-member trustee board unanimously approved a six-part plan to establish the Executive Level controls for Reccord during a meeting stretching seven and a half hours at NAMB’s Atlanta-area headquarters in Alpharetta, Ga. The meeting was held in executive session because SBC trustees typically meet in private when dealing with personnel issues.

NAMB’s chief operating officer, Chuck Allen, submitted his resignation on March 22.

Allen “resigned for reasons that did not involve our discussions today in the board meeting,” Holcomb said. “Chuck Allen has been a friend of the trustees. … We stand ready to assist Chuck Allen in whatever future ministry opportunities God has for him.” Holcomb, otherwise, declined further comment about Allen’s departure.

Reccord has been NAMB’s president since its founding in 1997 as part of the Southern Baptist Convention’s restructuring, called “Covenant for a New Century.” NAMB primarily was formed in a merger of the SBC’s former Home Mission Board, Radio and Television Commission and Brotherhood Commission. At the time Reccord was pastor of First Baptist Church in Norfolk, Va.

Under the accountability plan for Reccord, a trustee subcommittee will be appointed by Holcomb “to develop a set of Executive Level controls to be used as a guide” related to various issues raised in the Feb. 16 Christian Index article.

The subcommittee, which Holcomb said he hopes to name during the coming month, will propose controls for:

1) “directing the travel, speaking, and on-campus office time required for the President….”

2) “the use of RFP’s” (Request For Proposals), akin to bidding to compete for work being outsourced by NAMB.

3) “when the President … wants to develop new initiatives, including the appropriate oversight and approval by the Board.”

4) “clarifying what constitutes poor management by an executive officer and how it should be handled.”

5) providing Reccord and NAMB “with greater levels of accountability to the Board and the Southern Baptist Convention.”

Under the sixth part of the plan, the board assigned “its duly elected officers, in perpetuity, with the role of monitoring these controls, utilizing them as part of the President’s annual review, and reporting the status of these controls annually at an assigned full Board meeting.”

Holcomb, pastor of Bethany Baptist Church in Adalusia, Ala., noted that SBC President Bobby Welch attended the meeting.

“I phoned him about a week ago and I said, ‘Bobby, we’d like to invite you to be there for our meeting. I would like for you to be able to say to Southern Baptists that the board of trustees of the North American Mission Board handled the business at hand. And he sat through almost our entire meeting. He was very pleased with how things went and he said, ‘Barry, the board has done an excellent job. They’ve addressed the facts. And Southern Baptists don’t have anything to be ashamed of.’”

Reccord said in a statement: “I am thankful that the trustee process worked. That’s why we have such a process. While we jointly found opportunities and areas on which to strengthen and improve, I celebrate the fact that the deep and thorough financial and practices audit gave us a clean bill of health, including the status and history of our reserves.” 

Holcomb said Reccord told the trustees “that he understands that, as president of this agency, he is under our directorship. … He said, ‘I am willing to work with the trustees in whatever parameters we need to,’ in order to address the concerns that Southern Baptists may have about the North American Mission Board. …

“I don’t want to speak for him, but I think it would be alright to say he recognizes, just like all of us, that he’s not perfect and we’re not perfect, and there are certain areas that we need to improve,” Holcomb said. “I think the recommendations that the board adopted today will help him. I think in that sense he is very happy to follow this process.”

“[Reccord's] job is not in jeopardy,” Holcomb said, noting that no disciplinary measures were taken by the board; “we found nothing to sustain any kind of thought of wrongdoing, anything unethical, anything immoral … .

“Dr. Reccord is a very visionary leader, and I think with any visionary he’s going to do things and lead in such a way that it puts us on the cutting edge of what we’re trying to in missions and evangelism,” Holcomb said. “And we’re at a point now of looking back at some of those things and some of those decisions and saying, ‘Here’s some things that worked and here’s some things that really didn’t work and we wouldn’t do that again.’ …

“But I think the trustees overwhelmingly today said, ‘Dr. Reccord, you are the visionary leader that God has given us.’”

William J. (Bill) Curtis, the trustees’ first vice chairman, said during the news conference that the trustees are “prepared to acknowledge that it is a shared responsibility for where we are at this point.”

“Rather than just place all the responsibility for some of the concerns that have been raised on the shoulders of the ELT [NAMB's Executive Leadership Team], as trustees we also acknowledge that this is a process that together we need to take ownership of and work through for the improvement of the agency and the good of the SBC,” said Curtis, one of the task force’s members and pastor of Cornerstone Baptist Church in Florence, S.C.

Another task force member, Tim Patterson, pastor of Hillcrest Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Fla., said, “We did not give Dr. Reccord a pass on anything …. We asked very tough, very pointed, very particular questions, because we want Southern Baptists to know that we want everything dealt with that is an issue.”

Said Holcomb: “We do not want to give the impression to anyone that we do not welcome criticism. As we worked we realized, ‘Hey, this is going to make us better, this is going to make us stronger.’”

Asked by a reporter about a fear among NAMB employees of being terminated if they raise concerns about the organization’s direction and operation, Holcomb and Curtis acknowledged that some staffers have voiced such fears.

Curtis said the task force report will reflect a concern “to see what we can do to remedy that.”

Patterson said the trustee task force appreciated the openness its members received.

“Everyone within this building and outside that we asked information of was very forthcoming, very helpful. No one was reticent or holding anything back. They [would say,] ‘What do you need? Anything else you need?’ And when we asked for personal opinion, they gave us personal opinion. No one that we asked held back anything.”

Reccord said he hopes NAMB now can refocus on its ministry.

“This has been a time of great distraction for all of our staff from the task of North American missions,” he said in his statement. “And while, like Nehemiah, we were committed ‘Not to come down from the wall,’ the forces of distraction were strong. Now it is time to get back to the work. Where mistakes have been made, I have made a pledge to use this process to correct those errors and work with our trustees to make NAMB a stronger agency.

“Our trustees have spent a multitude of hours and much energy reviewing all the facts and now I trust that Southern Baptists will trust their trustees and these processes and that we will move on together as we focus on reaching North America for Christ.”

The trustees’ nine-member task force, in addition to Holcomb, Curtis and Patterson, included Larry Thomas, director of missions for the Red River Baptist Association in Heber Springs, Ark.; Terry Fox, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Wichita, Kan.; David Crump, pastor of Aspen Park Baptist Church in Broken Arrow, Okla.; Timothy (Tim) P. Dowdy, pastor of Eagle’s Landing First Baptist Church in McDonough, Ga.; Albert (Al) Y. Kawamoto, a member of Arlington Park Baptist Church in Arlington, Texas; and Ellie Wade Ficken, a member of Vaughn Forest Baptist Church in Montgomery, Ala.

Categories: SBC

The IMB Trustee Chairman sends an open letter to laymen and pastors

March 16, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Dear Southern Baptist brothers and sisters,

Thank you for your passion for sharing Jesus. These are great days of opportunity and advancement in our work for the Lord. Advances are being made on a scale never before known in the history of Christianity. For this we join together in praise to our Savior.

I have addressed the following letter to pastors because they are the teachers and guardians of the Word for their congregations. Their sacred duty is a calling higher than that of the President of the United States and, as such, I wanted to address them concerning these doctrinal matters. But feel free to look over their shoulders and read this material.

There has been no small controversy concerning some of our recent decisions. However, as I have shared this information with pastors and others, most have expressed joy because information they had previously received was incomplete. Seeing the greater context has helped many to appreciate the decisions recently made. I pray you will have the same experience.

We are on a great adventure together. It stands to reason that our adversary would love to put us against one another. Let’s put all blame on our real enemy and work harder than ever to reach every person with the Gospel in our lifetime.

Thank you so much for your prayers. We are your servants and we appreciate every word you share, even the constructive criticism. I pray our hearts will be obvious as you read these pages.

For His Glory,

Tom Hatley
Chairman, International Mission Board trustees
Southern Baptist Convention

(To read the letter to pastors, click here.)

Categories: SBC

IMB releases position paper on baptism

March 10, 2006 · 4 Comments

Ben Stratton recently sent this out in his newsletter out concerning the IMB’s new view on baptism:

On Tuesday, March 7, the trustees of the Southern Baptist International Missions Board released “A Position Paper Concerning The IMB Guideline on Baptism”. This paper can be found here. It is a good article and explains why the IMB rejects missionary candidates who have not been baptized by doctrinally sound congregations (Baptist churches). I encourage each of you to read the article and tell others about it.

Also the trustees of the IMB have invited pastors and any interested Southern Baptists to e-mail their feedback to imbtrustees@imb.org

What are your thoughts on the matter? I know that John Piper of Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis has said that he does not feel this is a hill to die on and will receive members who have been sprinkled. I believe that being immersed is the biblical way because (1) Jesus did it that way (Mark 1:10) and (2) the word ‘baptism’ comes from the Greek baptizo which means to immerse or to dip. So I would have to agree with the IMB.

But what do you think?

Categories: SBC

City moves to condemn SBC church using eminent domain (BP)

March 10, 2006 · Leave a Comment

It’s finally happened.

LONG BEACH, Calif. (BP)–City leaders in Long Beach, Calif., have classified the Filipino Baptist Fellowship’s building as a blighted area and are forcing the congregation out in order to make way for condominiums.

The path for the case was laid when the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 last summer in Kelo v. New London, Connecticut that a city’s use of eminent domain to transfer property from one private party to another may qualify as a “public use” protected by the Constitution.

John Eastman, director of The Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence who is defending the church, said the case -– the first involving a Baptist church — may play a key role in reversing the high court’s eminent domain decision.

(Click on the blog title to read the entire article.)

Categories: Politics · Religious Liberties · SBC

Jim Richards on the IMB Controversy

February 16, 2006 · 1 Comment

For too long I have been deafened by the silence of doctrinal debate in Southern Baptist life. We struggled for 20 years to establish the basis of our belief concerning the nature of Scripture. Southern Baptists settled the discussion by saying the Bible is the inerrant Word of God. We had little time to discuss other doctrinal issues.

Regardless of the position you take on speaking in tongues, the practice has never been widespread in Baptist churches. Pentecostalism at the turn of the 20th century and the charismatic movement in the 1970s popularized tongue speaking, but neither made it biblical. Whether you are a closed dispensationalist or require tongue speaking to conform to rules found in 1 Corinthians chapters 12 through 14, the modern practice in American churches does not qualify as scripturally authentic. There is more I could say but I find the baptism controversy even more intriguing.

Liberalism, neo-orthodoxy and existentialism had an impact on how many people approach the practice of Christianity. This approach would place the highest value on the individual’s experience and personal opinion. You see baptism is not a personal issue. It is not about “how I feel about my baptism.” It is not just the sincerity of the candidate. It is about scriptural authority. The question is whether baptismal authority is individual or congregational.

Jesus gave the commission to baptize to the local church. If the commission were given to every believer then any 9-year-old girl who was a Christian could baptize her convert in the backyard swimming pool. Jesus vested the authority to baptize in the church. The Baptist Faith and Message says baptism is a church ordinance. The local church is the custodian of the ordinances. Only a New Testament church can administer scriptural baptism. There are a few identifying marks of a New Testament church. Are all Baptist churches, New Testament churches? Probably not! Are there New Testament churches that are not Baptist churches? Sure, because what makes a New Testament church is what it teaches, not the name over the door. By the way, one of the identifying marks is that a New Testament church will teach security of the believer.

Doctrine does matter. It is not too late to raise the banner of doctrinal sufficiency of the Scriptures and reclaim our heritage as people of the Book.

(Jim Richards is the Executive Director of the Southern Baptists of Texas state convention. The above is part of an article he wrote on the IMB controversy in the Southern Baptist Texan Issue on Feb. 6, 2006. I was especially glad to see Richards is a strong believer in church authority in baptism and is doing his best to encourage and remind others of the doctrinal heritage that Baptists have.)

(Sent to me by Ben Stratton: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LandmarkSouthernBaptist )

Categories: SBC